Home » Fixing the Problems, Justice System, Justice for the Jena 6

Mychal Bell is back behind bars

By Carmen D. on Friday, October 12th, 2007, 8:30 am Comments

UPDATE — Legal experts say Judge’s order may contradict Louisiana laws — READ: ‘Jena 6 teen’s return to jail draws queries’ Howard Witt, Chicago Tribune

I awoke to the news that Mychal Bell, now the most well known defendant in the Jena Six case, was back behind bars, in jail. It appears that because of Bell’s fight with Justin Barker, Bell’s probation on two counts of simple battery and two counts of criminal destruction of property has been terminated and he will serve 18 months in a secured juvenile facility. Unfortunately, the details of the hearing and Bell’s whereabouts are murky in part due to the gag order placed on all parties by 28th Judicial District Court Judge J.P. Mauffray. (And yes, it was Judge Mauffray’s earlier decision regarding Bell’s Jena Six related charges that was reversed on appeal.)

I have mixed feelings about this latest development. I am so angry at Bell for violating the terms of his probation and deeply sad to see another young, black man behind bars. Yes, the sentence smells of a kind of retribution for the September march and overall cry for justice for the Jena Six. And there’s the rub, by fighting, Bell put himself in position for this kind of move to take place.

I understand that some people will greet Bell’s re-incarceration with a sigh of relief. There are numerous reports, by black citizens of Jena, that Bell (and other star athletes) caused a great deal of trouble in town. (Mostly chronicled in www.thetowntalk.com, but those articles are now only for sale.) Those same reports note that when African Americans made calls to white law enforcement, to report Bell’s alleged acts of vandalism, the police officers were slow to respond and often disinterested in making a full report. And there are still others who in chat rooms around the web, are already saying, “See. We told you so. Are you coming back to march now?”

They don’t get it. As I wrote to a friend about a month ago when he complained that the “full picture” of Mychal Bell was not being presented: Bell may be or become an incorrigible social delinquent, for all I know. But he deserves the protection of equal justice and I will stand for his right to that. Because when “the system” decides to cut corners on people it doesn’t like, I could be next, or you could be.

I cannot say that Bell’s probation should not have been revoked because of his involvement in the fight with Justin Barker. I do not have a simple opinion about it because I do not have enough information at this point although I will keep looking for a fuller, verifiable account of events. I strongly disagree with those asserting that Bell should be immune from the consequences of his prior actions because he is involved in the Jena Six case. Crime ravages communities and assaults the individual psyche. Everyone who commits a serious crime should be dealt with firmly and decisively.

  • Muffin
    I'm reading all these Articles about him going back to jail and that maybe he should be there. We are leaving out the facts here people. He commited a crime in his early days before he became a victim of "The Jena 6" but what us Americans aren't understanding is, those charges that were held against him before, they knew of them and yet they wait until he's finished with his case and finally punish him. But with the time he done in prison, could've counted up to his 18 months. They were willing to charge him with those allegations of murder, but wait til he get out to put him right back in. You people are out of your minds of you believe he should serve more time, within those 10 months he done in prison, it should be counted as him doing time since he was the only Jena 6 to be punished. I believe he done 10 months, he has 8 months left to do.
  • Blair
    Mychal Bell’s alleged involvement in the Jena Six beating incident played no role in Judge J.P. Mauffrey’s decision to sentence him to 18 months in a juvenile detention facility. Prior to the Jena Six incident, Bell had been convicted of battery and placed on parole. While on parole for this first offense, he committed a second offense. He was convicted a second time of battery and found guilty of violating his parole on the first offense. However, his sentencing for the second offense was postponed when he became implicated in the Jena Six beating. When his conviction as an adult in connection with the Jena Six beating was overturned, the postponed sentencing for his second convction moved forward. The attorneys present at the sentencing hearing say that the Jena Six incident was never mentioned at the setencing hearing. He will be probably be retired as a juvenile for his alleged participation in the Jena Six beating.
blog comments powered by Disqus