Home » Fixing the Problems, Stand for Children, Waking Up

Are we two kinds of people?: How it matters

By Carmen D. on Wednesday, July 9th, 2008, 8:38 am Comments

Although The Wire, my favorite television show of all time, ended months ago a couple of scenes haunt me still. And I’d say that one scene fuels my sense of urgency about how important it is to have productive discussions about race across the widest possible array of people. It’s the scene where neglected, homeless and gentle natured Dookie asks his would be mentor, “How do you get from here to the outside world?” For Dookie, here is the blighted Baltimore neighborhood he is trapped in. Although it sits just 40 minutes from our nation’s capital, Dookie’s part of Baltimore is as perilous as many CNN covered war zones. The hundreds of thousands of real life Dookie’s are national treasures that we leaving to rot.

How do I reach his mother? Or how would you reach his other crack addicted relatives who sold his school uniforms for dope money and let the water get turned off so there was no place for Dookie to bathe or launder his clothes? Because of his odor, he was declared Dookie by classmates. And with no hope, eventually, inevitably, Dookie too ended up on dope.

See, I figure if we are two kinds of people then maybe there is a different language I need to learn. Maybe that’s it. Maybe I need to string together my words in a different sequence to break through; to get “them” to see a better way for themselves and their children. And yes, I am judging here. Hell, yes. Why wouldn’t I judge that every child has a right to a basic standard of care? Do I have empathy for addicts? Yes, I do and that is why I believe rehab on demand should be a national priority. But at the same time, why get pregnant time and time again if you are drug addicted? I will not condone that. And I refuse to accept that common sense makes me an elitist.

I believe Dookie and I are the same type of people and I don’t know how to help him.

  • JP, thank you for that. You are a brilliant thinker and a sincere seeker of truth. I am honored to know you. 'Response-ability.' I love that and will think on it.
  • JP
    Maybe it is just the term, "two kinds of people," that makes it difficult for me to accept the premise. Every time I read about people like Dookie I am reminded of Stephen Jay Gould's sentence: "I am somehow less interested
    in the weight and convolutions of Einstein's brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops."

    We know we are in a world of individuals, everyone
    different but possessing similarities. All born with a potential that can be developed or stunted by their circumstances, opportunities, family,
    culture, educational, economic, and political systems. Some may overcome obstacles while some will not take advantage of opportunities presented.
    (Hell, they may not even be recognized as opportunities!) One of the criteria for success (however you want to define it) is responsibility. But let's deconstruct the word to response-ability, perceived options and one's ability to see and act on the options. This is learned. If one can not see options, or if they are not allowed to see them, even if available to some, and if they believe they are not achievable, they are not real options.
    (it doesn't matter whether this is a family, state, educational, social, or cultural failure, the result is the same.)

    Without this response-ability, stress rises, frustration occurs, and anger/violence can result. Bad choices are made. Yes, it may appear to be stupid. And yes, sometimes we would like to reachout and attempt to shake some sense into them, but THAT is the same stupid option. We do not know what to do. That is our limited response-ability. Welcome to stress and frustration.
blog comments powered by Disqus